Common Mistakes When Choosing a Display

A display is often chosen based on its appearance and price. That’s understandable, but in practice, most problems don’t stem from how a display looks, but from how it’s used. Mistakes made during the design phase or in the selection of materials affect visibility, assembly, transportation, and lifespan.

What these mistakes have in common is that they are rarely immediately apparent upon delivery. They only become noticeable once a display is actually put into use: on the trade show floor, in a retail setting, or during repeated transport. This blog explains common mistakes made when choosing a display from the perspectives of construction, use, and practical application. It also clarifies the practical costs of these mistakes.

Mistake 1: Designing without taking viewing distance and sight lines into account

A display may be visually striking and technically well-produced, but it may still fail to function adequately if viewing distance and sightlines are not explicitly taken into account. At a trade show or event, visitors rarely assess a display up close. The first impression is formed from a distance, often while moving and from an oblique angle.

When a design is evaluated on a screen or on paper, a distorted impression quickly arises. Text that appears legible on A4-sized paper loses its function at a distance of three to five meters. An image intended to be an eye-catcher fails to make an impact when its contrast, scale, or positioning are not tailored to the surroundings.

In addition, external factors such as lighting, differences in height, and other elements in the immediate surroundings play a role. Without taking these conditions into account, a display only becomes visible once someone is already standing in front of it, causing it to lose its function as an attention-grabber.

This mistake often occurs when:

• designs are evaluated without a physical scale model
• viewing distance is not determined in advance
• walking direction and viewing position are not taken into account

Consequences in practice:
Reduced visibility, less attention-grabbing appeal, and a display that fails to fulfill its role in attracting visitors.

Mistake 2: Choosing a display based on purchase price rather than intended use

A low purchase price is often seen as an advantage, but says little about a display’s suitability for its intended use. The crux of this mistake is that price is disconnected from intended use. A display designed for temporary use behaves differently when used more frequently.

Repeated use leads to wear and tear, reduced stability, or limitations in adaptability. These are not manufacturing defects, but the result of a design that is not tailored to the intensity of use. These problems build up gradually and often only become apparent after multiple uses.

Typical causes:

• no clear definition of service life
• comparing displays without considering lifespan
• focus on purchase costs rather than costs per use

Consequences in practice:
Replacement, repair, or modification in the short term, resulting in total costs that are higher than those associated with a higher initial investment better suited to the intended use.

Learn more about our standard displays and custom displays.

Mistake 3: Not Taking Transportation and Setup Into Account

Displays are often judged based on their final appearance, not on the process leading up to it. However, transportation and setup are integral parts of their use. Weight, volume, and assembly sequence determine how much time and effort are required to get a display ready for use.

When these aspects are not taken into account, a situation arises in which a display is theoretically sound but practically impractical. Components may be heavy, difficult to handle, or assembled in an illogical manner. This leads to improvisation on site, which increases the risk of damage and prolongs setup time.

In addition, the human factor plays a role. A display that seems simple on paper can be complex in practice when it is assembled by different people.

This error occurs when:

• transportation methods are not factored into the design
• assembly is considered only in theory
• no consideration is given to who will be assembling the display

Consequences in practice:
More time wasted, higher logistics costs, and an increased risk of errors or damage during setup and takedown.

Point 4: Consider Material Selection Independently of Intensity of Use

Material selection is often based on appearance or a general notion of durability, but not always on how intensively a display will be used. In practice, the material determines not only how a display looks, but above all how it behaves during transport, setup, and repeated use.

Each material has specific properties that determine whether it is suitable for temporary or long-term use. When these properties are not explicitly taken into account, a mismatch arises between expectations and reality.

Broadly speaking, the following material choices can be distinguished for displays:

• Cardboard displays
  Lightweight and efficient for temporary use. Suitable for short campaigns and limited transport. Less suitable for repeated use or long-term stress.
• Wooden displays
  Dimensionally stable and sturdy, suitable for long-term use. Heavier and bulkier, requiring more attention to transport and storage.
• Metal displays
  Structurally strong and suitable for modular and repeated use. Require a well-thought-out design to keep weight and handling manageable.
• Magnetic displays
  Flexible in construction and adaptable in use. Place high demands on precision and finish to ensure consistent performance.

This error occurs when:

• the frequency of use is not explicitly defined
• temporary materials are used for permanent applications
• robust materials are chosen without a functional necessity

Consequences in practice:
Faster wear and tear or unnecessarily high investments without added functional value.

Mistake 5: Assuming a Single Fixed Application

Many displays are designed for a single specific situation: a fixed stand size, a fixed message, or a single type of environment. That makes sense in and of itself. Problems arise when a display is later used more broadly, even though it is not technically prepared for that.

What starts as a display for a single application is later used in a different context. This reveals limitations that were not taken into account in the initial design.

Examples that illustrate this:

• A display designed for a corner setup that is later placed in a row setup
• Fixed dimensions that do not fit a larger or smaller display area
• Panels with fixed content that need to be changed regularly
• An assembly sequence that only works with one specific configuration

Signs that this issue is present:

• Components are not modular
• Minor changes require new production runs
• Modifications affect stability or appearance

Consequences in practice:
Limited flexibility and additional costs as soon as the application changes.

The Combined Cost of These Errors

The costs of these errors rarely amount to a single large expense. They accumulate in the form of extra hours spent on setup, replacement of parts, repairs, and reduced visibility at crucial moments.

These costs are often spread out over time and are therefore less visible, but they do have a definite impact on a display’s return on investment.

How to Prevent These Mistakes

Preventing these mistakes does not require complex solutions, but rather clear definitions established in advance. By explicitly defining how a display will be used, a logical framework for design choices is created.

Key questions to consider include:

• How often is the display used?
• In what environments?
• Who sets it up?
• What role is it intended to fulfill?

By answering these questions in advance, many mistakes can be avoided as early as the design phase.

From Mistake to Functional Choice

A display doesn’t have to be able to do everything, but it must be suited to its application. By identifying common mistakes before making a decision, the investment remains manageable and functional. This prevents unnecessary costs and ensures that a display does what it’s meant to do: be visible and function reliably in practice.